Research outputs
The works below are openly archived on Zenodo. Status labels distinguish conceptual preprints from peer-reviewed or empirically validated research.
2026
The Knowledge Abundance Paradox and the Institutional Economics of Scientific Coordination
This paper defines the Knowledge Abundance Paradox as a quality-adjusted failure of conversion: candidate-production costs fall and output rises, yet lifecycle cost per warranted and integrated update increases or net knowledge surplus declines. It compares paper-centered coordination with a DGP-linked hybrid and develops a falsification and adoption agenda.
Fu, X. (2026). When Papers Stop Scaling: The Knowledge Abundance Paradox and the Institutional Economics of Scientific Coordination (Version 1.0) [Preprint]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22053957
2026
DGP Multiverse Science as an AI-Native Architecture for Scientific Knowledge
This paper proposes DGP Multiverse Science: a plural and versioned population of candidate data-generating processes maintained in a Living Knowledge Base, interrogated through a Research Engine, and updated only through an independent Verification Engine.
Fu, X. (2026). Beyond Paper-Centric Science: DGP Multiverse Science as an AI-Native Architecture for Scientific Knowledge [Preprint]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21988999
Status policy. A Zenodo deposit establishes a persistent, citable public record; it does not constitute peer review. Empirical claims will be labeled separately only after their evidence and validation status can be inspected.